Metastatic Melanoma Treatment in Special Populations.

ABSTRACT: This review outlines the most up-to-date metastatic melanoma treatment recommendations and relevant risks for patients with solid organ transplants, patients with renal dysfunction, and patients with preexisting autoimmune conditions. These specific treatment populations were excluded from the original clinical trials, which studied immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in the advanced melanoma setting. We have synthesized the current body of literature, mainly case series and retrospective analyses, to reflect the evidence for the treatment of these special patient populations at present.

Treatment of Stage III Resectable Melanoma-Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Approaches.

ABSTRACT: Patients with stage III resectable melanoma carry a high risk of melanoma recurrence that ranges from approximately 40% to 90% at 5 years following surgical management alone. Postoperative systemic adjuvant therapy targets residual micrometastatic disease that could be the source of future recurrence and death from melanoma. Randomized phase III adjuvant trials reported significant improvements in overall survival with high-dose interferon α in 2 of 3 studies (compared with observation and GMK ganglioside vaccine) and with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg compared with placebo and ipilimumab 3 mg/kg compared with high-dose interferon α. In the modern era, more recent phase III trials demonstrated significant recurrence-free survival improvements with anti-programmed cell death protein 1, pembrolizumab, and BRAF-MEK inhibitor combination dabrafenib-trametinib (for BRAF mutant melanoma) versus placebo. Furthermore, anti-programmed cell death protein 1, nivolumab and pembrolizumab have both been shown to significantly improve recurrence-free survival as compared with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg. For melanoma patients with clinically or radiologically detectable locoregionally advanced disease, emerging data support an important role for preoperative systemic neoadjuvant therapy. Importantly, a recent cooperative group trial (S1801) reported superior event-free survival rates with neoadjuvant versus adjuvant therapy. Collectively, current data from neoadjuvant immunotherapy and targeted therapy trials support a future change in clinical practice in favor of neoadjuvant therapy for eligible melanoma patients.

Vemurafenib induces senescence in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome by activating the HIPPO signaling pathway: implications for potential targeted therapy.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) remain dismal despite the development of treatment. Targeted therapy is gaining more and more attention in improving prognosis. METHODS: Expression of BRAF was analyzed by RT-qPCR in AML and MDS patients. Cells viability treated by drugs was measured by CCK-8 assay. Network pharmacology and RNA-sequence were used to analyze the mechanism of drugs and verified in vitro and xenograft tumor model. RESULTS: Here we showed that BRAF was overexpressed in AML and MDS patients, and correlated with poor prognosis. The BRAF inhibitor-Vemurafenib (VEM) could significantly induce senescence, proliferation inhibition and apoptosis in AML cells, which can be enhanced by Bortezomib (BOR). This inhibitory effect was also verified in CD34 + cells derived from AML patients. Mechanistically, we showed that VEM combined with BOR could turn on HIPPO signaling pathway, thereby inducing cellular senescence in AML cells and xenograft mouse. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our findings demonstrate a significant upregulation of BRAF expression in AML and MDS patients, which is associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes. We also discovered that the BRAF inhibitor Vemurafenib induces cellular senescence through activation of the HIPPO signaling pathway. Analysis of BRAF expression holds promise as a prognostic indicator and potential therapeutic target for individuals with AML and MDS.

The role of CRAF in cancer progression: from molecular mechanisms to precision therapies.

The RAF family of kinases includes key activators of the pro-tumourigenic mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Hyperactivation of RAF proteins, particularly BRAF and CRAF, drives tumour progression and drug resistance in many types of cancer. Although BRAF is the most studied RAF protein, partially owing to its high mutation incidence in melanoma, the role of CRAF in tumourigenesis and drug resistance is becoming increasingly clinically relevant. Here, we summarize the main known regulatory mechanisms and gene alterations that contribute to CRAF activity, highlighting the different oncogenic roles of CRAF, and categorize RAF1 (CRAF) mutations according to the effect on kinase activity. Additionally, we emphasize the effect that CRAF alterations may have on drug resistance and how precision therapies could effectively target CRAF-dependent tumours. Here, we discuss preclinical and clinical findings that may lead to improved treatments for all types of oncogenic RAF1 alterations in cancer.

Convergent MAPK pathway alterations mediate acquired resistance to FGFR inhibitors in FGFR2 fusion-positive cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is a knowledge gap in understanding mechanisms of resistance to fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors (FGFRi) and a need for novel therapeutic strategies to overcome it. We investigated mechanisms of acquired resistance to FGFRi in patients with FGFR2-fusion-positive cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who received FGFRi therapy and underwent tumor and/or cell-free DNA analysis, before and after treatment, was performed. Longitudinal circulating tumor DNA samples from a cohort of patients in the phase I trial of futibatinib (NCT02052778) were assessed. FGFR2-BICC1 fusion cell lines were developed and secondary acquired resistance mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway were introduced to assess their effect on sensitivity to FGFRi in vitro. RESULTS: On retrospective analysis of 17 patients with repeat sequencing following FGFRi treatment, new FGFR2 mutations were detected in 11 (64.7%) and new alterations in MAPK pathway genes in nine (52.9%) patients, with seven (41.2%) patients developing new alterations in both the FGFR2 and MAPK pathways. In serially collected plasma samples, a patient treated with an irreversible FGFRi tested positive for previously undetected BRAF V600E, NRAS Q61K, NRAS G12C, NRAS G13D and KRAS G12K mutations upon progression. Introduction of a FGFR2-BICC1 fusion into biliary tract cells in vitro sensitized the cells to FGFRi, while concomitant KRAS G12D or BRAF V600E conferred resistance. MEK inhibition was synergistic with FGFRi in vitro. In an in vivo animal model, the combination had antitumor activity in FGFR2 fusions but was not able to overcome KRAS-mediated FGFRi resistance. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest convergent genomic evolution in the MAPK pathway may be a potential mechanism of acquired resistance to FGFRi. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT02052778. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: We evaluated tumors and plasma from patients who previously received inhibitors of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), an important receptor that plays a role in cancer cell growth, especially in tumors with abnormalities in this gene, such as FGFR fusions, where the FGFR gene is fused to another gene, leading to activation of cancer cell growth. We found that patients treated with FGFR inhibitors may develop mutations in other genes such as KRAS, and this can confer resistance to FGFR inhibitors. These findings have several implications for patients with FGFR2 fusion-positive tumors and provide mechanistic insight into emerging MAPK pathway alterations which may serve as a therapeutic vulnerability in the setting of acquired resistance to FGFRi.

HSPA8 Activates Wnt/ß-Catenin Signaling to Facilitate BRAF V600E Colorectal Cancer Progression by CMA-Mediated CAV1 Degradation.

BRAF V600E attracts wide attention in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) as stratifying and predicting a refractory classification of CRC. Recent evidence indicates that Wnt/ß-catenin signaling is broadly activated and participates in the refractoriness of BRAF V600E CRC, but the underlying molecular mechanism needs to be elucidated. Here, heat shock 70 kDa protein 8 (HSPA8), an essential regulator in chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA), is identified as a potential therapeutic target for advanced BRAF V600E CRC. These results show that HSPA8 is transcriptionally upregulated in BRAF V600E CRC, which promotes CMA-dependent degradation of caveolin-1 (CAV1) to release ß-catenin into the nucleus and thus activates the Wnt/ß-catenin pathway, contributing to metastasis and progression of BRAF V600E CRC. Of note, HSPA8 directly interacts with the KIFSN motif on CAV1, the interaction can be enhanced by p38 MAPK-mediated CAV1 S168 phosphorylation. Furthermore, pharmacological targeting HSPA8 by VER155008 exhibits synergistic effects with BRAF inhibitors on CRC mouse models. In summary, these findings discover the important role of the HSPA8/CAV1/ß-catenin axis in the development of refractory BRAF V600E CRC and highlight HSPA8 as a predictive biomarker and therapeutic target in clinical practice.

Effectiveness, safety and utilization of cobimetinib and vemurafenib in patients with BRAF V600 mutant melanoma with and without cerebral metastasis under real-world conditions in Germany: the non-interventional study coveNIS.

Cobimetinib/vemurafenib combination therapy is approved for treatment of adults with unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600 mutated malignant melanoma (mM). The non-interventional post-authorisation safety study coveNIS collected real-world data on cobimetinib/vemurafenib treatment focussing on overall survival (OS), safety and utilization. MM patients with brain metastases are usually excluded from clinical studies. coveNIS observed 2 cohorts: mM patients without (Cohort A) and with cerebral metastases (Cohort B), aiming to close the data gap for the latter population. A direct comparison of the 2 cohorts was not intended. The primary effectiveness objective was OS; the safety objective was the incidence of all and of serious adverse events (AEs). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), time to development of cerebral metastasis (Cohort A) and time to central nervous system relapse (Cohort B). All statistical analyses were descriptive. Between 2017 and 2021, 95 patients were included (Cohort A: 54, Cohort B: 41 patients) at 32 sites in Germany. Median OS was 21.6 months in Cohort A, 7.4 months in Cohort B. Median PFS was 6.9 months in Cohort A, 5.2 months in Cohort B. The proportion of patients experiencing any AEs was 83.3% (Cohort A) and 87.8% (Cohort B). The two most common AEs in Cohort A were 'diarrhoea' (37%), 'vomiting' (20.4%) and 'pyrexia' (20.4%); in Cohort B 'diarrhoea' (36.6%) and 'fatigue' (22%). In conclusion, the OS rates in Cohort A and Cohort B of coveNIS are in line with the OS data from other trials with BRAF/MEK inhibitors for mM. No new safety signals were observed.

Advances in the management of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: transforming a life-threatening condition into a potentially treatable disease.

Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is an infrequent thyroid tumor that usually occurs in elderly patients. There is often a history of previous differentiated thyroid cancer suggesting a biological progression. It is clinically characterized by a locally invasive cervical mass of rapid onset. Metastases are found at diagnosis in 50% of patients. Due to its adverse prognosis, a prompt diagnosis is crucial. In patients with unresectable or metastatic disease, multimodal therapy (chemotherapy and external beam radiotherapy) has yielded poor outcomes with 12-month overall survival of less than 20%. Recently, significant progress has been made in understanding the oncogenic pathways of ATC, leading to the identification of BRAF V600E mutations as the driver oncogene in nearly 40% of cases. The combination of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (D) and MEK inhibitor trametinib (T) showed outstanding response rates in BRAF-mutated ATC and is now considered the standard of care in this setting. Recently, it was shown that neoadjuvant use of DT followed by surgery achieved 24-month overall survival rates of 80%. Although these approaches have changed the management of ATC, effective therapies are still needed for patients with BRAF wild-type ATC, and high-quality evidence is lacking for most aspects of this neoplasia. Additionally, in real-world settings, timely access to multidisciplinary care, molecular testing, and targeted therapies continues to be a challenge. Health policies are warranted to ensure specialized treatment for ATC.The expanding knowledge of ATC´s molecular biology, in addition to the ongoing clinical trials provides hope for the development of further therapeutic options.

A Real-World Retrospective Study to Evaluate the Reliability of Cetuximab plus Capecitabine versus Capecitabine as Maintenance Therapy in Patients with RAS and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The optimal maintenance therapy for rat sarcoma (RAS) and v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) remains unclear. It is critical to evaluate the reliability of cetuximab-capecitabine (the observation group) relative to capecitabine alone (control group). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, patients with RAS and BRAF mCRC admitted to Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, between January 2016 and October 2020 were enrolled and treated with cetuximab plus 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as an initial therapy. Patients whose disease was controlled after at least six cycles of treatment were administered a maintenance therapy until disease progression. We also analyzed the prognosis of patients according to clinicopathological features. Altogether, 39 RAS and BRAF mCRC patients were recruited from January 2016 to October 2020, with 18 cases in the treatment group and 21 cases in the control group. The difference in baseline clinicopathological features between the two treatments is not obvious. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival after maintenance treatment in observation group (9.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) = 6.4-12.6]), was significantly better than the control group (7.3 months [95% CI = 5.8-8.8]). During maintenance treatment, there were no deaths caused by treatment-related adverse events, and the overall incidence of rash acne was different between the observation and control groups (p < 0.05). Most adverse events were mild and easily controlled. Primary tumor site, baseline carcinoembryonic antigen levels, and microsatellite instability status were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Maintenance therapy using cetuximab plus capecitabine improved survival in patients with mCRC and was well tolerated by patients.

Oligometastatic Melanoma Treated by Metastasectomy in Combination with Immune Checkpoint and BRAF Inhibitors: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND Early therapies for metastatic melanoma improved patient quality of life; however, median survival remained unaffected. Studies are showing that surgical excision with the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has better outcomes than systemic therapy alone. This single-center case series describes 7 patients with oligometastatic melanoma treated by metastasectomy in combination with ICI and BRAF inhibitors. CASE REPORT One female and 6 male patients are included in our study, with ages ranging from 34 to 82 years. Oligometastatic melanoma is defined was having no more than 5 metastatic regions. Each patient had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Patients received either ICI therapy with ipilimumab, nivolumab, and/or pembrolizumab, or targeted therapy with encorafenib and binimetinib, or a combination. Patients underwent metastasectomies with curative intent. The main outcome and measurements obtained were the duration of disease-free survival, based on radiographic evidence. The range of disease-free survival in our population was 13 to 67 months, with the lower end limited by patient death and the upper limit being the present day. CONCLUSIONS This case series reiterates survival benefit for patients who received metastasectomy after exhibiting good response to ICI therapy. ICI and/or BRAF inhibitor therapy combined with metastasectomy provides a possible curative option for patients who may have previously been relegated to palliative-focused care. By using a multimodal approach with oncologists and surgeons, we can challenge our understanding of what constitutes a resectable cancer.

From a mutation to a drug / Od mutacji do leku.

Malignant melanoma is a dangerous skin cancer, accounting for the majority of skin cancer-related deaths. Many patients with this cancer have the V600E mutation in the BRAF gene. This mutation causes constitutive activation of the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway, significantly contributing to the process of carcinogenesis. We discuss the drug design process on the example of a specific BRAF V600E inhibitor, vemurafenib. We begin with the most commonly used drug design methods. The second part of the article focuses on vemurafenib. We analyze the invention of this BRAF V600E inhibitor and its analogue as well as the course of three stages of clinical trials. Then we provide information about other popular drugs for malignant melanoma, i.e. dacarbazine, ipilimumab and dabrafenib, and about the advantages of therapy with the simultaneous use of two inhibitors. Finally, we briefly discuss the role of artificial intelligence in the future of drug design.

Uveitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or BRAF/MEK inhibitors in patients with malignant melanoma.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency and characteristics of uveitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or BRAF/MEK inhibitors (B/MIs) in patients with malignant melanoma. Patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma who underwent radical or local resection for malignant melanoma, regardless of clinical stage or postoperative adjuvant therapy, at Hiroshima University Hospital from January 2015 to June 2021 were enrolled in a retrospective cohort. The medical records of patients were collected to estimate the prevalence of ocular adverse events. The clinical characteristics of patients who developed uveitis were reviewed. Among 152 patients, 54 and 12 were treated with ICIs and B/MIs, respectively. Four patients developed uveitis; 1 in the ICI group and 3 in the B/MI group, while there were no uveitis cases among patients who did not receive ICIs or B/MIs. Three patients had Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease-like findings. Uveitis was improved by steroid therapy with or without oncological treatment interruption. Oncological treatment could be resumed. Patients with melanoma treated with ICIs or B/MIs had a higher risk of uveitis compared with those who did not receive them. Oncological treatment could be resumed in all patients who developed uveitis.

Efficacy of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Combined Therapy as a First-Line Therapy for Patients with Advanced Melanoma and the Urgent Need for an Effective Second-Line Therapy for Patients with Wild-Type BRAF in Japan: A Single Center Retrospective Study.

Therapeutic advantages of immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1), and anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) in melanoma have been reported recently. In this study, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the combined use of nivolumab and ipilimumab as a first-line therapy for Japanese patients with advanced melanoma. Moreover, we examined the effects of second-line treatment. Seven patients were enrolled in this study. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 7 months (95%CI, 1.868-12.132) and 12 months (95%CI, 0.000- 27.397), respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 42.9 % and 85.7 %. Three patients chose pembrolizumab monotherapy as second-line therapy after the combination therapy due to their BRAF wild-type status, which resulted in progressive disease. ORR and DCR were 0% and 33.3%, respectively, with pembrolizumab. Grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 71.4% of the patients treated with the combined-therapy. All irAEs were treated with corticosteroid or hormone replacement therapy. Although this single center retrospective study had some limitations, it demonstrated good efficacy for the combined use of nivolumab and ipilimumab as a first-line therapy for Japanese patients with advanced melanoma. Moreover, poor efficacy was observed for the second-line therapy after the combined therapy. These findings suggest that a novel second-line therapy is required for patients with advanced melanoma in Japan, particularly for patients with wildtype BRAF.

Impact of posaconazole and diltiazem on pharmacokinetics of encorafenib, a BRAF V600 kinase inhibitor for melanoma and colorectal cancer with BRAF mutations.

Encorafenib is a potent and selective ATP competitive inhibitor of BRAF V600-mutant kinase approved for patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma and colorectal cancer. Encorafenib is mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 in vitro and may be susceptible to drug-drug interactions when co-administered with CYP3A inhibitors or inducers. The primary objective was to assess the impact of the strong CYP3A inhibitor posaconazole (part 1) and the moderate CYP3A and P-gp inhibitor diltiazem (part 2) on encorafenib pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers following a single 50-mg dose. A total of 32 participants were enrolled (16 each in parts 1 and 2). The area under the curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf ) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) geometric mean for encorafenib increased by 183% and 68.4%, respectively, when co-administered with posaconazole. Apparent encorafenib clearance decreased from 26.0 to 9.2 L/h when coadministered with posaconazole, and plasma terminal half-life (t½ ) of encorafenib increased from 4.3 to 7.3 h. The AUCinf and Cmax geometric mean for encorafenib increased by 83.0% and 44.7%, respectively, when co-administered with diltiazem. Similarly, the apparent encorafenib clearance decreased from 29.0 to 16.0 L/h when co-administered with diltiazem, and plasma t½ of encorafenib increased from 6.6 to 7.9 h. There were no deaths, serious adverse events (AEs), or patient discontinuations due to AEs in parts 1 or 2. The most frequently reported treatment-related AEs were erythema (n = 14; 88%) and headache (n = 11; 69%) in part 1 and headache (n = 7; 44%) in part 2. The results of this study indicate that co-administration of encorafenib with strong or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors should be avoided.

[Updated AWMF Guideline on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Langerhans cell Histiocytosis in Children and Adolescents]. / Aktualisierte AWMF Leitlinie zur Diagnostik und Therapie der Langerhanszell Histiozytose (LCH) im Kindes- und Jugendalter.

Langerhans cell Histiocytosis is a rare neoplastic disease, which occurs mainly in children and adolescents. The disease may affect any organ, and therefore, the clinical symptoms vary widely. Some patients have a spontaneous remission of the disease, whereas others experience a rapid and potentially lethal clinical course. The therapeutic approach depends on the extent of the disease, and reaches from a watch-and-wait strategy to chemotherapy with the standard drugs vinblastine and prednisone. The identification of mutations in the MAPK-pathway resulted in growing interest in targeted therapy using compounds such as the BRAF inhibitors. Chronic relapses and permanent sequelae are important problems of LCH and are the focus of current research.

A phase I, single-center, open-label study to investigate the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of encorafenib following a single oral dose of 100 mg [14 C] encorafenib in healthy male subjects.

Encorafenib is a novel kinase inhibitor of BRAF V600E as well as wild-type BRAF and CRAF and has received approval, in combination with binimetinib, to treat BRAF V600E or V600K mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma or in combination with cetuximab to treat BRAF V600E mutation-positive colorectal cancer. The absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) of encorafenib was studied by administering [14 C] encorafenib (100 mg containing 90 µCi of radiolabeled material) to 4 healthy male subjects (NCT01436656). Following a single oral 100-mg dose of [14 C] encorafenib to healthy male subjects, the overall recovery of radioactivity in the excreta was ≥93.9% in all four subjects, indicating that good mass balance was achieved. An equal mean of 47.2% for the radioactivity dose was eliminated in the feces and urine. The percentage of the dose eliminated in the feces (5.0%) and urine (1.8%) as unchanged encorafenib was minor. Metabolism was found to be the major clearance pathway (~88% of the recovered radioactive dose) for encorafenib in humans and is predominantly mediated through N-dealkylation of the isopropyl carbamic acid methyl ester to form the primary phase 1 direct metabolite M42.5 (LHY746). Oral absorption was estimated from the radioactive dose recovered in the urine (47.2%) and the total radioactive dose recovered in the feces as metabolites (39%). Based on these values and the assumptions that encorafenib and its metabolites are stable in feces, the fraction of oral absorption was estimated to be at least ~86%.

Treatment experience with encorafenib plus binimetinib for BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma: management insights for clinical practice.

For patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma who have BRAF V600 activating mutations, combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors is now the standard of care. The combination of encorafenib, a highly selective adenosine triphosphate-competitive BRAF inhibitor, plus binimetinib, a potent, selective, allosteric, non-adenosine triphosphate-competitive MEK1/2 inhibitor, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations based on data from the phase III COLUMBUS study (NCT01909453). Clinical data evaluating BRAF and MEK inhibitor combinations in advanced melanoma indicate a specific profile of adverse events that includes serious retinopathy, skin disorders, and cardiovascular toxicities. Here we provide an overview of the rationale for combining BRAF and MEK inhibitors for the treatment of melanoma, long-term safety results from COLUMBUS, and guidance on managing the most common adverse events associated with this combination based on clinical experience. Proactive and appropriate management of adverse events can allow for longer treatment durations and may result in better treatment outcomes.

Interleukin 17 signaling supports clinical benefit of dual CTLA-4 and PD-1 checkpoint inhibition in melanoma.

Recent studies suggest that BRAFV600-mutated melanomas in particular respond to dual anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). Here we identified an over-representation of interleukin (IL)-17-type 17 helper T (TH17) gene expression signatures (GES) in BRAFV600-mutated tumors. Moreover, high baseline IL-17 GES consistently predicted clinical responses in dual-ICI-treated patient cohorts but not in mono anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 ICI cohorts. High IL-17 GES corresponded to tumor infiltration with T cells and neutrophils. Accordingly, high neutrophil infiltration correlated with clinical response specifically to dual ICI, and tumor-associated neutrophils also showed strong IL-17-TH17 pathway activity and T cell activation capacity. Both the blockade of IL-17A and the depletion of neutrophils impaired dual-ICI response and decreased T cell activation. Finally, high IL-17A levels in the blood of patients with melanoma indicated a higher global TH17 cytokine profile preceding clinical response to dual ICI but not to anti-PD-1 monotherapy, suggesting a future role as a biomarker for patient stratification.